RE: It is not too soon for honest citizens to rebe
Posted: 10/10/2004 12:55:12 AM
By: Comfortably Anonymous
Times Read: 1,537
0 Dislikes: 0
Topic: News: Politics
Parent Message
(Also posted at: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=125028&cid=10480319

OK, explain this to me then - isn't it COMPLETELY antithetical ("The opposite" if you don't know that word) to the ideas of Freedom and Democracy for the presidential debates to be conducted by a private corporation? No checks and balances, no true options, no true freedom. If any place is not the place for a private corporation to be involved, it is the most public part of presenting the candidates for leading this so-called free country to the people who will vote for them? Why are all possble options not being presented?

As far as property rights - what "property" do they allegedly have "rights" to? The presidential candidates themselves? Or some fake dog & pony show that misleads the public into thinking it is an official presentation of the government?

I have no respect for their rights since they are essentially saying that my rights (Properly selecting the best candidate to give my vote for president) belong to them.

I spit on them as an American who values freedom.

Are you too dumb to fear this?
Rating: (You must be logged in to vote)
Discussion View:
Replies:

RE: It is not too soon for honest citizens to rebe
Posted: 10/10/2004 12:55:12 AM
By: Comfortably Anonymous
Times Read: 1,537
0 Dislikes: 0
Topic: News: Politics
Oh yah, this is what I was replying to= with the previous message:

From http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=125028&threshold=1&commentsort=3&tid=103&mode=nested&cid=10478615
The Commission on Presidential Debates isn't a governmental entity--it's a private corporation. Why doesn't Badnarik, as a "libertarian", respect their property rights?
Rating: (You must be logged in to vote)